For further irony, after the recent ranting about 'drug-driving' in the press and local government the following details were published:
In the Northumbria Police Service area there were 38 deaths caused by road traffic collisions. Of these, 6 were killed by drivers who were above the legal alcohol limit, a further 10 were found to be under the influence of drugs.
For those who can't be arsed with the maths, this means that 22 people were killed by drivers who were sober and , apparently, able to control their vehicle.
Though, I think, here lies the problem: control. Maybe educating drivers on how to control their vehicle so they are not map-reading, applying make-up, talking on a phone, reading the paper, eating a sandwich or drinking will mean they will actually be watching the *BLEEP*ing road and conditions!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm all for road safety, however, as previously stated, a change of limit is not the answer. Let's face it, on a de-restricted rural road in poor conditions certain drivers will still 'aim' for 50-60mph, if the limit were changed will they drive any differently? I doubt it.
10p spent